
Soon Made in China:
High-Tech Products
Intel Investment Shows
How Nation's Economy
Is Climbing Value Chain
By ANDREW BATSON
March 23, 2007; Page B4
BEIJING -- China is demonstrating a surprising ability to parlay
its dominance in low-end manufacturing into a new strength in producing sophisticated high-tech
goods.
Already the place where many of the world's computers and mobile
phones are put together, it is expected to become home to a multibillion-dollar integrated-circuit plant run
by Intel Corp., the world's biggest maker of computer
chips.
The speed at which China is moving into more-complex manufacturing
is a sign that its transition from a low-wage economy making cheap goods to a high-wage economy producing
valuable ones may not be as difficult as once thought.
China's government said last week it had approved Intel's
application to build a $2.5 billion integrated-circuit manufacturing plant in the northeastern port city of
Dalian. Intel, of Santa Clara, Calif., is expected to announce details of its plans on Monday in
Beijing.
Intel spokesman Chuck Mulloy said, "We have said for many years
that we would be interested in putting a fabrication facility in China, but we have nothing more to say about
that at this time."
No Longer Just Assembly
The electronics business is one of the main areas in which the
transformation of Chinese manufacturing is taking place, and foreign investment is crucial for those changes.
This deal also illustrates the force behind that transformation: The critical mass that China has built up in
the labor-intensive, but relatively simple, assembly and manufacturing of many products is now allowing it to
attract higher-value parts of those businesses.
China assembles much of the world's home electronics, such as DVD
players, having attracted manufacturers with its low land and labor costs and its efficient ports and
transportation infrastructure. Their investment has made China the place where the parts are put together,
but not usually the source of the parts themselves or of the designs -- which are often the most lucrative
segments of the business.
But now an increasing number of key components are being
manufactured domestically, as companies see the benefits of putting that production close to the point of
final assembly. More and more integrated circuits are being produced here. A decision by Intel to build a
chip-fabrication facility in China, its first in a developing country, is likely to accelerate that
trend.
China's evolutionary push also reflects worries that low-cost
assembly and manufacturing isn't a sustainable business model. Economic growth is pushing wages and living
standards ever higher. So China's government and industry aren't assuming that its competitive advantage in
low-cost labor will be permanent, and they are working to establish different
strengths.
"Yes, China has a lot of labor, but at this moment we still have a
skilled-labor shortage, and in coastal areas the labor costs have been rising. In India, labor costs are even
lower than in China," said Qian Wang, an economist with J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. "When labor costs rise
again in the future, labor-intensive products may not be that advantageous anymore."
China's investment boom of the past couple of years has helped
speed the shift. High profits and cheap bank loans have allowed companies to build new factories and install
higher-quality equipment, reducing their need to buy from more advanced economies. That has in turn expanded
the nation's trade surplus and contributed to frictions with the U.S. and European
Union.
Philippines Could Be Cheaper
"China is going to continue to move up the value chain. But the
U.S. isn't static," said John Frisbie, president of the U.S.-China Business Council, an advocacy group. "Our
economy continues to innovate. Everyone said Japan was going to eat our lunch, but they
didn't."
Ed Pausa, a semiconductor-industry specialist at
PricewaterhouseCoopers, said that contrary to popular belief, China isn't the cheapest place to run an
integrated-circuit operation. The Philippines, for example, could be cheaper. But logistically, he said,
China is irresistible.
"If you already have a factory making laptops or cellphones here,
you want to have your supply chain as integrated and tight as you can," Mr. Pausa
said.
The pattern in electronics is also seen in other industries.
Chinese steelmakers have recently begun producing types of high-end processed steel that previously had to be
imported. The car business has gone from near-total reliance on imported parts to heavy use of components
made and designed at home.
There is still a technical gap. Intel's plant, while advanced by
Chinese standards, is expected to be two generations behind the state of the art at the time it opens,
probably in a couple of years. It is unlikely to manufacture Intel's signature microprocessors, the
calculating brains of a computer. The Chinese government's announcement said the plant's main product will be
chipsets, which play a supporting role.
'Growing Stage'
"It's certain that Intel is not putting its most advanced
technology in China, where the semiconductor industry is still in an early, but growing, stage," said Mo
Dakang, a Chinese semiconductor-industry consultant. U.S. export controls and other restrictions are likely
to continue to restrain international semiconductor companies from using top-level technology in their China
facilities, he said.
Intel's decision to go with a lower-level technology was probably
based on two main considerations: protecting trade secrets from competitors in China and obtaining U.S.
government approval to move the needed technology into the country. It could also help limit the political
backlash in the U.S.
In Washington, the concern on Capitol Hill in recent years has
chiefly been with Chinese investments in the U.S. Intel's investment would be outbound, and so fundamentally
different; so far it has attracted little attention among politicians. But in the current political climate,
there is always a risk that U.S. lawmakers may raise alarms as the deal gains wider attention. Of concern
would be the potential risk of transferring to China civilian technologies that could be adapted for military
use, or that might eventually put U.S. companies at a long-term competitive
disadvantage.
--Greg Hitt in Washington and Zhou Yang in Beijing contributed to
this article
China Seeks to
Transition
To Next Technological Stage
By MICHAEL CONNOLLY
March 23,
2007
The speed at which China is moving into more-complex manufacturing
is a sign that the transition the nation is pursuing -- from a low-wage economy making cheap goods to a
high-wage economy producing valuable ones -- might not be as difficult as once thought. The electronics
business is one of the main areas in which the transformation of Chinese manufacturing is taking place, and
foreign investment is crucial for those changes.
As Andrew Batson reports, China is demonstrating a surprising
ability to use its strength in low-end manufacturing as a lever to help it expand into some of the world's
most sophisticated high-tech businesses. Already the place where many of the world's computers and mobile
phones are put together, it is expected to become home to a multibillion-dollar plant run by Intel Corp., the
world's biggest maker of computer chips. Intel is expected to announce plans for the plant Monday in Beijing
following Beijing's announcement last week that it had approved the U.S. company's application to build a
$2.5 billion integrated-circuit manufacturing plant in the northeastern city of
Dalian.
This deal illustrates the force behind China's transformation: The
critical mass that China has built up in the labor-intensive, but relatively simple, assembly and
manufacturing of many products is now allowing it to attract higher-value parts of those businesses. But
China's push also reflects worries that low-cost assembly and manufacturing isn't a sustainable business
model. Fast economic growth is pushing wages and living standards ever higher, and the one-child policy will
limit workforce growth. So China's government and industry aren't assuming that its competitive advantage in
low-cost labor will be permanent, and they are working to establish different
strengths.
UNDERWRITING
GROWTH: With only local Chinese brokerage firms and the handful of
foreign joint ventures permitted to underwrite domestic initial public offerings in China, foreign investment banks
UBS AG, Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and Morgan Stanley all stand to gain from a flurry of IPOs this year underwritten
by their joint ventures. UBS's venture is working on its first share offering -- of airport operator Beijing
Capital International Airport Co. -- while Goldman's tie-up is preparing the offering of Bank of Ningbo Co., as
Nisha Gopalan reports. Morgan Stanley's 34%-owned China International Capital Corp. is the leading foreign joint
venture by number of deals, though the U.S. bank is a passive stakeholder.
At the same time, regulatory barriers that limit bond issuance
mean that 78% of all corporate financing comes from banks or the domestic stock market. So far US$12.8
billion of issues have been approved this year, that's just a tiny fraction of what companies would raise
with bonds if they could. Economists had hoped Premier Wen Jiabao's declaration in January that the country
would "vigorously" develop its corporate bond market would be followed by swift action to speed and simplify
issuance. But things don't move that quickly in China. Nonetheless, the government is considering
transferring control of the bond market from the state planning agency, the National Development and Reform
Commission, to the more market-oriented China Securities Regulatory Commission, which could lead to greater
and faster issuance.
Meanwhile, UBS Asia Chairman and Chief Executive Rory Tapner has
set his sights this year on acquiring a banking license in India and beefing up the Swiss bank's
wealth-management business in the region, after leading a wide-ranging expansion in Asia, as Kate Linebaugh
reports. In India, UBS's lack of a license, which would allow it to trade a range of fixed-income products
and offer wealth-management services, puts it behind competitors such as Citigroup Inc. of the U.S. and
Deutsche Bank AG.
|
FenderSplendor®,
Inc
PO Box 6277
Gulf Shores, AL 36547
USA Toll Free: 866-310-2539
Office: 251-948-2130
Fax: 253-663-0906
info@fendersplendor.com
|
 |
 |
|
FenderSplendor * Home * Warranty * About * Free Gifts *
Order Now * Facebook * Twitter *
FS 502 Blog *

FenderSplendor®
Registered Trademark
|